Educational proof of concept. Illustrative institutional mock-up, seeded demo data — not a production analytics backend.
HOD / Dean Institutional View

What ContractLab could show at the institutional level

Not a production analytics dashboard — a demonstration of what this platform could provide once connected to real student data across sections.

DEMO MODE Seeded cohort data for demonstration — nothing below is a real institutional roster.
This entire view uses seeded, illustrative institutional data for demonstration purposes. ContractLab does not currently have a production backend, a real student roster, or cross-section analytics — see docs/EVIDENCE_SCHEMA.md for the path from this mock-up to a real integration.
126
Students, 3 sections
Seeded Demo Cohort
84%
Active this term
Seeded Demo Cohort
61%
Completed all 8 stages
Seeded Demo Cohort
47%
Meeting illustrative advanced-task threshold
Seeded Demo Data

Capability attainment across sections Seeded Demo Cohort

Strongest: Rule Knowledge
Strong
Weakest: Authority Selection
Developing
Client File mission completion
58%

Faculty-visible areas requiring intervention Illustrative Insight

!
Authority selection is the weakest capability institution-wide.

Consistent across all 3 seeded sections — students distinguish doctrine well but pick authority by superficial keyword match more often than factual fit.

!
Advanced-task performance lags completion rate.

61% complete the full journey, but only 47% meet the illustrative advanced-task threshold (multi-round Decision Labs and the Client File Authority Table passed without a hint) — suggesting completion alone overstates readiness. This is a demo-cohort pattern, not a measurement of "independent legal reasoning" as such — see docs/EVIDENCE_SCHEMA.md on what independence telemetry this PoC does and doesn't yet capture.

→
Recommended institutional focus.

A shared authority-hierarchy module across all 3 sections before the next client-file mission cycle.

What students can actually do

The employability case for the platform — grounded in the specific capabilities tracked, not a generic completion certificate.

  • ✓ Identify legal issues from messy, undirected facts
  • ✓ Apply and distinguish precedent on the actual facts, not just keywords
  • ✓ Select relevant authority and explain why weaker options don't fit
  • ✓ Draft professional legal advice for a named recipient and purpose
  • ✓ Challenge AI-generated legal analysis before relying on it